Comments on: git repo (mirror) for rt/org.eclipse.ecf http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186 ...living the offbeat Fri, 09 Jul 2010 22:35:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: zx’s diatribe » Git Mirrors @ Eclipse http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/comment-page-1#comment-50713 zx’s diatribe » Git Mirrors @ Eclipse Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:17:39 +0000 http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/#comment-50713 [...] you want to see Git at Eclipse (like other people)? Do you already mirror some of the Eclipse code base with [...] [...] you want to see Git at Eclipse (like other people)? Do you already mirror some of the Eclipse code base with [...]

]]> By: Pascal http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/comment-page-1#comment-40432 Pascal Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:53:16 +0000 http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/#comment-40432 Given that you are a committer on ECF, what is the advantage the git based approach you are proposing over creating a CVS branch? Given that you are a committer on ECF, what is the advantage the git based approach you are proposing over creating a CVS branch?

]]> By: markus http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/comment-page-1#comment-40315 markus Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:51:07 +0000 http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/#comment-40315 Antoine, are you referring to the case where I pull other people's patches into my master (accepting contributions)? Or "just" about the case where each and every line is written by myself as a committer? The former bears no discussion while the latter seems unproblematic (to me). To clarify I don't wanna move a way from CVS but am simply been looking for an easy way to do bigger refactorings without screwing with HEAD. And after using ClearCase UCM for a while, one is pretty much used to having private streams. :-) [1] http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/ip-process-in-cartoons.php Antoine, are you referring to the case where I pull other people’s patches into my master (accepting contributions)? Or “just” about the case where each and every line is written by myself as a committer? The former bears no discussion while the latter seems unproblematic (to me).

To clarify I don’t wanna move a way from CVS but am simply been looking for an easy way to do bigger refactorings without screwing with HEAD. And after using ClearCase UCM for a while, one is pretty much used to having private streams. :-)

[1] http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/ip-process-in-cartoons.php

]]> By: Antoine http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/comment-page-1#comment-40306 Antoine Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:19:22 +0000 http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/#comment-40306 Of course you cannot push changes the changes from the git repo to the CVS repo. That would break the IP tracability of your contributions. Of course you cannot push changes the changes from the git repo to the CVS repo. That would break the IP tracability of your contributions.

]]> By: markus http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/comment-page-1#comment-40303 markus Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:11:42 +0000 http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/#comment-40303 http://github.com/guides/using-the-egit-eclipse-plugin-with-github how to configure git and setup the workspace. http://github.com/guides/using-the-egit-eclipse-plugin-with-github how to configure git and setup the workspace.

]]> By: markus http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/comment-page-1#comment-40301 markus Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:52:34 +0000 http://www.lemmster.de/blog/index.php/2008/12/23/186/#comment-40301 FWIW the repo is updated/synced with CVS every 15 min. FWIW the repo is updated/synced with CVS every 15 min.

]]>